Login | Register
You are here > Reviews > Parker's reviews >
Choose another manufacturer

Chrysler car reviews

300C

2005 on

Chrysler 300C Saloon Saloon 2005 on
  • Unmistakeable; outstanding diesel
  • Looks will be too brash for some; thirsty Hemi
Chrysler 300C Touring Touring 2006 on
  • Styling; easy access rear
  • Looks aren't for everyone; V8 is thirsty
Chrysler 300C SRT-8 SRT-8 2006 on
  • Thundering performance from lazy V8 engine, space, comfort
  • A little thirsty, lacks pedigree against Audi S cars and BMW M cars
Crossfire

2003 on

Chrysler Crossfire Coupé Coupé 2003 on
  • Audi TT-rivalling visual appeal, Mercedes-Benz underpinnings
  • Badge lacks kudos
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster Roadster 2004 on
  • Striking looks, glorious engine, Mercedes-Benz underpinnings.
  • Plastic interior when rivals offer aluminium; Badge lacks kudos.
Grand Voyager

2008 on

Chrysler Grand Voyager Station Wagon 2008 on
  • Excellent practical features, improved comfort and quality.
  • Diesel engine noisier and less efficient than rivals.

2001 to 2008

Chrysler Grand Voyager Estate 2001 to 2008
  • Hugely practical seating arrangement from 2005.
  • Has no other major advantage over modern large people carriers.
Neon

1999 to 2003

Chrysler Neon Saloon 1999 to 2003
  • Equipment, value.
  • Less refinement and rear space than some rivals.
PT Cruiser

2000 on

Chrysler PT Cruiser Estate 2000 on
  • Reasonably practical and earliest cars are very affordable
  • Would be more fun with a bigger engine.
Chrysler PT Cruiser Cabriolet Cabriolet 2005 on
  • Eye-catching and exclusive
  • Restricted visibility, dated interior, difficult to access boot
Sebring

2007 on

Chrysler Sebring Saloon Saloon 2007 on
  • Roomy, high specification
  • Disappointing performance and handling
Voyager

2001 to 2008

Chrysler Voyager Estate 2001 to 2008
  • Good value for money, upmarket appearance
  • No one wants petrol versions, feels dated