Chrysler PT Cruiser (00-08) - Review

Review by Dan Harrison on
Last Updated: 11 November 2008
Chrysler's PT Cruiser combines hot-rod looks and retro style with a healthy dose of practicality. It's an off-beat alternative to the family hatchbacks like the Ford Focus or Vauxhall Astra, although it lacks the engine choice, build quality and refinement of these popular models. The plasticky interior feels cheap and it's not especially comfortable with a rough ride on uneven surfaces. However, it's affordable, quite practical and worth considering if you're after something out of the ordinary. A 2006 facelift added fresher interiors and a more powerful 2.2-litre diesel engine.
2.5 out of 5

Other Chrysler reviews

3 out of 5

Comfort

The PT Cruiser isn't really an MPV - you should think of it more as a larger hatchback. As a leftfield choice instead of a Focus, Golf or Astra, it's roomy with lots of head and legroom, but some buyers may find the seats a little too upright and the rear bench seat isn't ideal for long journeys. Plus despite Chrysler's claims that cabin noise has been reduced, excessive wind and road noise still makes long trips tiring.

3.5 out of 5

Practicality

The rear seats are removable, but they're heavy and bulky, which makes it a more difficult job than it should be. However, they are foldable, which in conjunction with a wide-opening tailgate, gives the PT Cruiser a good load area. With them in place there's 620 litres of boot space - which is more than a BMW 5-Series Touring. However, the glovebox is quite small with only enough space for a couple of A-Z maps and there isn't much useable stowage in the front of the cabin.

Get a Chrysler PT Cruiser valuation

How does the boot space compare?

525 litres
423 litres
305 litres
Chrysler PT Cruiser (00-08)
120 litres
2 out of 5

Behind the wheel

A highly-adjustable driving position makes for an adequate drive, but the dash is confusing, with buttons placed without logic - you really have to hunt around for some. Worse still is the awful plastics used that feel cheap and scratchy in most places, while rear visibility is restricted by the rear pillars and headrests. Cars from 2006 have a much improved driving position and the dials are easier to read (they're no longer in a 'tunnel' housing) plus the buttons and switches are more logically placed and easier to use. But the seats are still far and the plastics are little better - the silver finish on the centre console simply looks naff.