SEAT Arosa (97-04) - Review Review by Parkers on 01 January 1997 For those looking for a value-for-money town car, there can be few models better than the Arosa. It shares its looks - and most parts - with the more expensive VW Lupo. It's cheaper to buy, better value-for-money, but just as good to drive as its Teutonic cousin. Good choice of engines and it feels modern and almost funky inside. Good deals around, too. Biggest problem is poor rear legroom and luggage space. 3.5 out of 5 Other SEAT reviews Summary Facts & Figures Equipment Driving & Performance Comfort Costs Safety & Reliability Buying & Selling Also Consider Company Car Info Owners' Reviews Gallery Also Consider 3.5 out of 5 Ford Ka (96-08) Still looks good, cheap to run, nimble around town, fun to drive Limited rear space, dated interior, lacks refinement, noisy on the motorway Read full review 4 out of 5 Volkswagen Lupo (99-05) Fun to drive, cheap running costs, well made, sporty GTI version available Small boot, SEAT Arosa does same for even less money, noisy on the motorway Read full review 4 out of 5 Peugeot 106 (91-03) Smooth ride, economical, fun to drive Tight in the back and very dated Read full review Find other hatchback cars Car Valuations Find used car prices with Parkers accurate car valuations. Find out more SEAT Arosa cars for sale We have 23 models like this for sale. Find SEAT Arosa cars for sale Previous: Buying & Selling Next: Company Car Info
3.5 out of 5 Ford Ka (96-08) Still looks good, cheap to run, nimble around town, fun to drive Limited rear space, dated interior, lacks refinement, noisy on the motorway Read full review
4 out of 5 Volkswagen Lupo (99-05) Fun to drive, cheap running costs, well made, sporty GTI version available Small boot, SEAT Arosa does same for even less money, noisy on the motorway Read full review
4 out of 5 Peugeot 106 (91-03) Smooth ride, economical, fun to drive Tight in the back and very dated Read full review