SEAT Arosa (97-04) - Review Review by Parkers on 01 January 1997 For those looking for a value-for-money town car, there can be few models better than the Arosa. It shares its looks - and most parts - with the more expensive VW Lupo. It's cheaper to buy, better value-for-money, but just as good to drive as its Teutonic cousin. Good choice of engines and it feels modern and almost funky inside. Good deals around, too. Biggest problem is poor rear legroom and luggage space. 3.5 out of 5 Other SEAT reviews Summary Facts & Figures Equipment Driving & Performance Comfort Costs Safety & Reliability Buying & Selling Also Consider Company Car Info Owners' Reviews Gallery 1 out of 5 Comfort Rear legroom is very cramped - even tall kids will be squashed against the back of the seats. There's plenty of headroom, though, so your long-bodied, short-legged friends will be fine. 1 out of 5 Practicality Luggage space is shameful. Only just enough room for a week's shopping with the back seat up. For those with no kids you can fold the rear seat (on all models) and get much more room. Get a SEAT Arosa valuation How does the boot space compare? Ford Ka (96-08) 186 litres Volkswagen Lupo (99-05) 130 litres SEAT Arosa (97-04) 130 litres 3 out of 5 Behind the wheel Supportive seats, but not exactly plush. Cabin doesn't feel as VW-like as you'd hoped for, but it is still good for the class (and the price). Equipment levels are reasonable and everything works smoothly. Car Valuations Find used car prices with Parkers accurate car valuations. Find out more SEAT Arosa cars for sale We have 23 models like this for sale. Find SEAT Arosa cars for sale Previous: Driving & Performance Next: Costs