You are here > News > Road tax > Family cars made worthless by road tax...
Family cars made worthless by road tax changes
 
 
Have Your Say!

Have your say

Post a comment
Have Your Say!
Added: 19 November 2008 18:12
we all moan about the tax rise but no one stands up to the goverment - there are millions of us crying about it, We pay tax to goverment (wages)so in theory they work for us, why dont we have the power to sack them? i know if i tickled my employer like this i would be sacked. They got people to stop smoking so could live longer to pay more tax and they can watch you suffer when they plummet your pensions. I think its time to do something and i dont mean riots and smashing up the areas we live in
Garbo, Local

Have Your Say!
Added: 18 November 2008 18:52
The simple solution is to buy a pre 2001 car if you want a larger engine. I own 2 cars, a 1994 Cavalier 1.8 Auto which I keep on the road for daily running about in. Its 14 years old but still comfy and when it breaks, I fix it. Its worth peanuts so no depreciation, £185 tax and 37 mpg avg - Bargain! My other one is a 1998 2.5L V6 Mondeo Ghia X, its worth £500, and also £185 tax. I drive it on weekends or for longer journeys, Luxury for peanuts - Bargain! Cars can last 20 years, so buy pre 2001.
Steve, Stoke On Trent

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 November 2008 09:19
Awful lot of ill informed people ranting here. Remember that the car has killed millions since its invention, but not without a little human help, i've tried myself, several times (not intentionally!). As for the emissions issue, its a short term problem, all revolving around the fact of it being a tax revenue source. What happens when everyone goes electric? thats why there are trials for charging for usage/mileage.
Colin, Bournemouth

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 November 2008 00:39
I cant believe the hammering car drivers and enthusiasts are getting, i have more than one car as cars are my hobby. i will have to pay £455 for each car, why when i only drive one at a time and dont do any extra miles with more than one car, so i dont pollute any more, the banding is nonsense as something like a lamborghni emits something like three times as much as my car but doesnt pay three times as much, why if its all about emissions. Its tax the most popular cars for the most income!
sb, manchester

Have Your Say!
Added: 13 November 2008 20:54
dont bite the hand that feeds u brown.what with unemployment on the rise and everything to get worse over the next twelve months at least,you want to rob us further,the very people who get us out of it.we are trying to work,we need our cars and people who doss or watever cant afford a pot to xxxx in let alone buy a car i ask where we are headed and how bad this country is really doing.
mike, weston-super-mare

Have Your Say!
Added: 13 November 2008 20:19
Once again its the driver that takes the brunt of it, why? My family all work hard to have a decent life and enjoy owning nice cars, so I ask, do we not already pay enough tax into this country as workers without penalising us more by increasing road tax. Seems to me that the so called peoples government are not here for us, they just want to ruin what life some people try to have,it's ok for parliticians with big wage packets, but for us everyday workers it soul destroying. Leave the drivers.
dawn vigers, birmingham

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 November 2008 20:42
I bought a Shogun Sport Equippe in 2004 to tow our caravan, I have quite a few health problems hence the reason for the 4x4 which is used only in two wheel drive on the road, I feel it is disgusting that we are being penalised with this hike in road tax, I only do 5000 miles a year and cannot afford to buy a new car I am a 70 year old pensioner, and there are many other caravanners in the same predicament as myself, we pay enough with the tax we pay on our fuel,without this extra cost.
regards
Brian Kelly, Shrewsbury

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 November 2008 09:53
Check out TFL's Low Emission Zone, ? Impact to me is a vehicle that had a value around £7000 is now worthless.
TFL communicate badly YOU must check to see if your passenger vehicle is OK, if not £100 per day charge for use within the M25 area.
My VW Caravelle gets classed as a minibus (but only has total eight seats)definition is nine seats inc driver.
ONLY method of appeal is to get the manufacturer to write to TFL, some chance.
TFL list modifications but only for big lorries.
Jonathan Carr, Sidcup

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 November 2008 00:45
Why tax the people, they should tax the manufacturer for producing cars that exceed a set limit,and people who bought thier cars before they decided these tax changes should be excempt.I'am all for the keeping things green changing the way we drive would help.
you don't always have to use your car, or drive full throtle every where ,so instead of charging us more to use our cars educate the people on how to drive Green. Every little bit helps.
Ben, Falkirk

Have Your Say!
Added: 31 October 2008 22:25
surely if we are going this way a more fare way to do it would be to set a basis rate ,say £50 p.a for the most effecient cars which do 50+ mpg then for every m.p.g your vehicle does less than 50 you would be charged an extra £10,so a car doing 25 mpg would pay £300,a car doing 45 mpg would pay £100 pa.this would ensure that v6 mondeo man would pay £300 and bentley arnage v12 man would pay £450[currently the same band].all owners would be subject not just 51 on. taking the worst cars of the road
phild, stourbridge

Have Your Say!
Added: 27 October 2008 22:15
most annoying is that fact that many of the higher polluting cars are automatics, there are many reasons why people need an auto and have no choice but to buy a big engine as that is the only model in the range with the auto box, some models are coming in, but they are new and out of our price range...very unfair and nothing to do with CO2 just more tax
SC, Glasgow

Have Your Say!
Added: 18 October 2008 16:30
Why don't we all give up work claim all benefits from the state we will not save any money with the banks so the government cannot tax us on our earnings then again on our savings we will not buy new cars then the car industry will collapse and we will not have to pay tax yet again when buying a new car or road tax how ar the government going to raise revenue.
Catherine Crout, Shrewsbury

Have Your Say!
Added: 09 October 2008 22:30
What about the cost of producing these new super effecient cars? It is fine saying that their use is less polluting but if you buy a new car every 3 years what does that add to the CO2 levels in it's production? How is this charged? My old Citroen Diesel ZX does 40 mpg, the cost of diesel is high and the cost of a new one is the same as it was when I bought new (M reg)so where is the equality in this? I am sure I could buy a much more efficient car but would it really be environmentally better?
Janet, Hendy-Gwyn

Have Your Say!
Added: 27 August 2008 17:21
Yet another way of hitting the average poor family. The rich families save yet more money by buying a new car that is cheap to run on fuel and has cheap road tax. The rest of us will end up with worthless cars, that cost a lot in fuel and road tax. It will be 8 years at least before we can get our hands on these latest cars. By then they in turn will seem environmentally bad as technologies change so they will get hit again with more tax.
K Keeble, Duxford

Have Your Say!
Added: 23 August 2008 16:24
I just traded my old (2000 X plate) Ford Focus 1800 petrol for a 2006 1600 Petrol Focus. The road tax has increased. This is obviously due to the fact the new replacement car is lighter, has a more fuel efficient engine, and taller gearing, all of which helps to reduce the emissions output.
Now the interesting thing is this. Our car was registerd 2 months prior to the new cut off date. The cars registered after the cut off date (fitted with identical running gear) have cheaper tax than ours.
Jim Welch, Doncaster

Have Your Say!
Added: 19 August 2008 17:23
Any one with car knowledge would have known about this 6 months ago.They should have got rid of the high tax cars then.I did.....Anyway, its simple.....just purchase a car pre march 2001 and pay regular tax if you really need a large family / big engined vehicle....no panic!
In 5 years time even a 1.8 litre vehicle will be classed as big engined so start saving up for an Electric or bi-fuel car or simply get the bus!
KEV KERRY, LOUGHBOROUGH

Have Your Say!
Added: 16 August 2008 09:24
why again are they hitting motorist and familys ?? They might as well scrap road tax and stick it on fuel at least that would justify the price of fuel at the moment!!! no one could not pay and those who do more miles would pay more seems a lot fairer way of road tax, ie those who use a lot pay a lot some years i only do 4000mile now my car tax is going to be £260 a year thats 7p per mile you dont even get that on business miles!!
dave, hull

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 August 2008 23:06
We should all stop paying tax and put £100 into a fund to pay for the cars that get caught. The government would have to fund the scraping of cars caught and would grind to a halt in about 3 weeks and they can't catch us all.
So you better watch out Mr Brown
Ian, london

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 August 2008 19:17
Well you think this is bad, whats going to be next on Brown`s motorist hit list !!! Don`t we as the voting public have a say on what he and his merry men are doing to us poor citizens of this once great nation.. errrrr not any more it seems... democracy.. whats that then ? anyone !!!!!!
Carl, Hull

Have Your Say!
Added: 08 August 2008 19:07
Car tax hikes: Political posturing is all this is. If they really cared about pollution they would take on the multi-national industrial giants, who i am sure kick out far more poluttants than you or I in our cars. The only fair way to tax the motorist is through fuel duty. He who does the most miles will pay most tax. Surely this would also save the Government millions per annum too. They wouldn't have to spend money trying to catch tax dodgers and they already collect duty off fuel anyway!
Mac1, Torquay

Have Your Say!
Added: 05 August 2008 23:32
I think I'm gonna sit on the fence with this one. Anyone arrogant enough to drive a big 4x4 around town deserves to be taxed off the road. On the other hand, MPVs are taxed heavily despite the fact that they can (and often do) take more people and luggage, meaning less cars on the road and lower emissions overall. I drive a 1997 car and will be paying 25% more tax than I would be if it was registered after March 2001. The system is a bit backward. Keep it fair and put all the tax on fuel
Simon, King's Lynn

Have Your Say!
Added: 05 August 2008 16:30
Why back date the tax changes. Allow people to make a choice when they come to change there car.

That I would find acceptable. But well Mr Brown, that one less vote from me.
Damien, Manchester

Have Your Say!
Added: 03 August 2008 21:13
will never vote for Lab or Tory or Lib dem again bunch of rip off power crazy political animals only interested in gaining control. Will retax my MPV in early Mar to avoid the £300 hike & save £90, then will only tax it when I need it for 3 months over the summer in 20010 then cash the tax in so will actually save ~£200pa.

GORDON & DARLING (& ALL OTHER TAX MAD POLITICIANS) - LISTEN CAREFULLY - YOU ARE GOING TO GET FIRED OVER THIS UNDERSTAND!?
phil, north london

Have Your Say!
Added: 02 August 2008 07:18
Think of all the lost revenue since they banned smoking and hundreds of thousands gave up.....its got to be clawed back from somewhere.
The half a million who quit and averaged 40 a day or £6 in tax is now costing £3million a day in lost revenue......so, do you really believe its all about the environment?
Gary, Dartford

Have Your Say!
Added: 01 August 2008 16:55
I'm young, drive a 2.5V6 4x4. And annoying for all the gas-guzzling bashing brigade, purely because I want to - gasp
I don't drive a lot. So any people at all that commute etc. use more fuel, produce more CO2 than me, wear the road surfaces down more than me.
Am I going to get a refund on my excessive tax to balance out how little I use my seemingly earth killing machine?
Don't blame 4x4 drivers. I don't holiday at all - when everyone stops flying off on holiday, I'll hand my car in, ok?
kay, lancaster

Have Your Say!
Added: 30 July 2008 15:11
I've just about had a titful of having my hard earned cash stolen from me by our greedy goverment. If I dont drive, I cant work, If I dont work I'll claim benefits, perhaps this is what I should do eh?
karen, bridgend

Have Your Say!
Added: 28 July 2008 22:37
Would those supporting this tax who've bought there 'OLDER' homes years ago that DONT meet the same energy saving regulations as a 'NEW' build home, like a 'Buy a better home' or pay a hefty 'environmental' taxation, i dont thinks so. I do my bit towards helping the environment as best i can, but my car and its engine, is MY choice just as your choice of home is. So why should i pay for a tax i wasnt aware of when i bought my vehicle? You dont pay tax on your energy waisting home do you!!!
Adrian Porter, Wellington, Shropshire

Have Your Say!
Added: 28 July 2008 22:36
Would those supporting this tax who've bought there 'OLDER' homes years ago that DONT meet the same energy saving regulations as a 'NEW' build home, like a 'Buy a better home' or pay a hefty 'environmental' taxation, i dont thinks so. I do my bit towards helping the environment as best i can, but my car and its engine, is MY choice just as your choice of home is. So why should i pay for a tax i wasnt aware of when i bought my vehicle? You dont pay tax on your energy waisting home do you!!!
Adrian Porter, Wellington, Shropshire

Have Your Say!
Added: 28 July 2008 21:18
whats all the fuss about petrol guzzelers. I drive a 4ltr jeep and it passes the mot co2. test every year.
the engine is always in fine tune. the computer adjusts the mixture automatic and tells me the results on my mpg.
the co2 is low when you drive at steady speed.
so I can't see any problem.
frank conlin, aberdeen

Have Your Say!
Added: 28 July 2008 11:36
"Why people think it's acceptable to drive round in such cars is beyond me. If people are strapped for cash, why buy a car with a 3-litre engine that drinks fuel."

This comment sums it all up, this tax is an envy tax with no relation to impact on the environment or people's needs. Yes, ok, I choose to drive a 3.2 as it meets our needs, but that is my choice from my hard earned money. I have no problem paying for the fuel to put in it, but to pay just have it sat on the drive is nonsensical
Rob, Oxford

Have Your Say!
Added: 25 July 2008 08:15
YIPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, labour loses a safe seat in the east of Glasgow biolection. The people of this country are sick of Gordon Brown and his HOODS screwing us left right and centre, they are not listening to the very people who voted for them, with there retrospective policies,(VED)& (FUEL COSTS) only to mention two of there Boo Boos. Gordon, the voices of the people will echo all over the country, WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH. Gordon, you will now last about as long as a snow flake in summer.
Steve Oswald, Penicuik

Have Your Say!
Added: 24 July 2008 18:53

I drive about 3000 miles per year, choosing mostly public transport instead of my car. Since I'll soon have to pay so much more in road tax, I may as well make the best of it and drive *everywhere* to get my money's worth.

Sad but true.
Tess Wright, Edinburgh

Have Your Say!
Added: 24 July 2008 12:45
my 18 year old car is still ok for the 3000 miles I do a year, however its a 4x4
and after 2010 the road tax will be more than the car is worth. I have been searching for the past 6 months for a suitable replacement but, because I am
6ft 9inch tall the only cars I can find that I fit in comfortably have a 2 litre or larger engine. So I have decided to by a 1968 Bently 6.8 litre, no road tax(Tax exempt)and low classic car insurance.High petrol costs?
No its been converted to run on LPG.
john roberts, romford

Have Your Say!
Added: 20 July 2008 14:12
Re "gas guzzling 4 x 4s"

The number of driven wheels does not affect the CO2 output of the engine.
A big engine will burn more fuel (generally) than a small one, CO2 is a function of fuel burn.

Scrap VED, put the tax on fuel. Use more fuel, pay more tax - easy innit.
Steve , Sharjah

Have Your Say!
Added: 20 July 2008 00:12
Good to see that most comments are against this tax and that we are not all swallowing the Climate Change blackmail; the UK could not even make a dent. Also, a note to all you people that keep on about everyone buying a more economic car - a car can serve more than one role; work wagon, social, child and pet transport, so a family plus large dog will not fit into a fart box. Plus, for example, say the most eco car is the 'XYZ', made by 'ABC'. If there is no ABC dealership in the area, what then?
Colin Welch, Poole

Have Your Say!
Added: 16 July 2008 15:59
The government should not put up the road licence based on CO2 emmisons of vehicules. This tax was supposed to be for building and maintaining roads and should be left as such.

Cars do not emit CO2 unless the engine is started, and to do this the vehicule needs fuel. CO2 emmision is, more of less, directly proportional to how much fuel is used i.e. how far the vehicule is driven. Therefore CO2 tax should be on levied on the fuel only.
Ron Smith, Stevenage

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 July 2008 20:37
I have a Honda Accord diesel as a company car, and a Honda S2000, which is my own weekend car, in which I cover about 3000 miles a year. the tax on this car will cost me more than my comprehensive insurance when the tax changes come in. It will not stop me driving it, however, but I feel inclined to buy a pre 2001 real gas guzzler like a TVR or similar, which will cost me less than 50% of the tax on my Honda, except no doubt Brown and his chums will screw everyone in due course.
John Crofts, Kenilworth

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 July 2008 17:45
I have voted labour all my life and have been a union member for 43 years.I shall not ever vote for a labour party again this is tottaly unexceptable this govourment is out of touch with reality and has done nothing for working class people. gordon brown and his party should resign.It is hard enough trying to survive at present having to work all the time so at 58years old i have had enough.you can tell mr brown this. People cannot carry on like this more and more people will drive cars without
david duffell, dorking surrey rh5 4au

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 July 2008 15:16
Why is it in Britain the motorist is deemed such an easy target for making money? From parking fees to fuel every one jumps on the band waggon.Also,as anybody noticed,when it is hot and sunny it is called global warming but when it is cold and wet it is called climate change.
mr w bates, stockport

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 July 2008 11:44
To be quite honest for cars that have reasonable emissions the tax hasn't really increased that much, we have two skodas an octavia 2.0TDi (co2 145) and a fabia 1.9TDi (co2 129) both cars have good performance, running costs and emit a lot less co2 than the cars you have mentioned. I mean why by a V6 and then moan about the running costs?
David, Halifax

Have Your Say!
Added: 14 July 2008 09:55
Another typical tax raid by the Labour party. That it is retrospective is absolutely immoral. I'm all for reducing the number of high-polluting vehicles on the road but this government seems totally out of touch with the common working man and the financial pressures that we have to cope with.
I'm just waiting for MPs to vote themselves a big increase in their car mileage allowance - the poor dears.
Graham, Grimsby

Have Your Say!
Added: 13 July 2008 21:47
It is a disgraceful tax imposed by labour for financial reasons & has little to do with environmental issues.
If they want to tax for environmental reasons why do they not tax foreign lorries using our roads & polluting our environment ?
Paul J, Kidderminster

Have Your Say!
Added: 13 July 2008 10:14
They have become like loan sharks and racketeers, apply any tax they wish when ever they need more money. Road tax is for the use of public roads so they can be maintained, thats why it was introduced, a fair system, yes back then but now only 20% of the funds raised from road tax is actually usded on the roads. I'm sure there is a case somewhere there to be taken to the European courts. Just because the government says so does not make it right. Oh they care so much about the environment.
Tariq, Birmingham

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 23:46
An absolute disgrace,the whole idea of the road tax reform is totally wrong,we already pay the highest fuel duty anywhere,if road tax needs to be reformed it should apply to new vehicles only and not be designed catch out many people who are unable to afford it and render there cars worth considerably less money into the bargain
steve harrod, norwich

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 23:14
At the least Highwayman in past years had the decency to weare a masks when robbing people.
In those days when found guilty they were sentanced and hanged on the gallows.
len halkyard, lancing sussex

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 21:58
The goverment are thiefs, the amount of money we give to them should be enough to make the roads in gold. Face it goverment you don't care about the environment the only green they like is money. Its too late anyway to worry about our planet, its beyond repair.
Carl Irving, Sheffield

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 17:04
I have been reading and listening to this new tax on cars set againest co2 imsions this leads me to a report I've been reading of car running on water Ha Ha you say but it has been proved so why dos'nt the govenment invest in this new technoligy. I also heard that is because the world bank wo'nt allow it because its money is derived from oil, so much for making the world a greener place. would'nt it be lovely to use your water from your tap,and why is diesal dearer than unleaded when its a bypro
denis, clacton on sea

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 11:46
Why people think it's acceptable to drive round in such cars is beyond me. If people are strapped for cash, why buy a car with a 3-litre engine that drinks fuel. For ten years we’ve been told about the impact that cars have on the environment and that oil prices will go through the roof, it’s sad that people didn’t listen and change their buying habits. Those people are now being forced through tax, which sounds fair to me. It's about being responsible rather than selfish.
Jason, Norwich

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 04:32
SIR/MADAM.
COMING TO MY END OF MY WORKING DAYS,I HAVE NEVER SEEN SUCH A ANTI GOVERMENT ON CAR OWNERS.I CAN NOW SEE WHY THEY ARE CALLED NEW LABOUR.I HAVE NEVER MINDED PAYING MY TAXES OR DUES,SOME YEARS AGO IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME RIGHT,QUOTE GET ON YOUR BICYLE WAS THE MESSAGE ?BUT THEN THIS GOVERMENT OF OURS WILL TAX THAT OFF THE ROAD.
MR K TUNNICLIFF, PLYMOUTH

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 01:11
Could we fit wheels to this government, like my wheelie bin, as they are full of rubbish too. Or shall I ask them for their bank account number, and sort code, so I can forward all my pension direct.
Andy greer, Kings lynn

Have Your Say!
Added: 12 July 2008 00:46
makes you want to go and buy and old mrk 2 escort again, cant believe this government surely this should be on new cars purchased from 09 not from 01 onwards, people in this country are being screwed by a crap labour government. surely my peugeot petrol car polutes less than the affor mentioned mrk 2? if so surely it should be cheaper. just another stealth tax by this crap labour party. this country has gone down hill since joinig the bloody EU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peter, bideford

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 23:35
These new laws should not be retrospective, for this is uncommon when new laws are passed in this country
frank, swanley

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 22:22
This change in VED has nothing to do with, or will have any effect on, saving the planet. The motorist is a soft touch and this government will stop at nothing to fleece us to fund their wasteful idealistic policies and the gravy train. To make the changes retrospective is tantamount to legalised theft.
It’s hard to believe that it has only taken 11 years for this deceitful and incompetent ‘New Labour’ government to completely screw up our country – if I was younger, I’d emigrate!
Jeff Stanton, Cwmbran

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 21:06
It's a stealth tax,it's like the government saying we want another 20% of your pay from 2001 to the present day
raystock, london

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 18:21
What about the proposals for the C charge in Manchester too. If they really didn't want people driving in the city centre, they should surround the whole damn thing with bollards
Tim , Bolton

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 18:17
This has got to be the final nail in browns coffin. I drive a 2.5 litre gas guzzler. No I don't need it, it's a luxury, but I only travel 4000 miles a year in it. why should I pay the same tax as someone who travels 25000 miles a year.
Tim, Bolton

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 18:00
I Think you people in England are much better off than us in Guernsey, regarding road tax, ous got abolished in 1-1-2008
and a tax was put on petrol, petrol was before the extra tax was around 50p a litre, with the tax it is 90p plus, It means I used to fill my tank every week for £10 Now it is £20 Witch means I am paying £520 per year extra, take off what I paid for my road tax £110 I am loosing £420 a year, my car a Suzuki Ignis 1300 Plus we do not pay VAT here
I will swop with U
Mr T Butcher, Guernsey Channel Iles

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 16:11
Now that the government is not getting the same amount of tax from cigarettes and drink the,ve got to get it from somwhere else. this whole green issue and climate change is blown out of all proportion in this country. what about the tons of rubbish floating about in space and the underground nuclear tests cant this be causing the so called climate change
Ted, Nottinghamshire

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 15:04
THOSE THAT BUY FUEL EFFICIENT CARS SHOULD BE REWARDED WHILST THE HIGH POLLUTING FOUR WHEEL DRIVES AND LARGE SALOONS SHOULD BE PENALISED AND MOST OF THESE VEHICLES ARE PURCHASED UNNECCESSARILY.
REG JOHNSTONE, GRETNA

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 14:21
I run a 2000 W Audi 1.9 diesel. Tax is £185 and to go to £200.

My partner has a 1.4 2002 Lupo (Iknow!!!)
£145 and to go to £150.

My emission is 146 Co2 the Lupo is 151 C02

So I am lower, so why should I pay £50 more for an older car! Not logical?
John Rippon, Prestatyn

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 14:06
if i thought for one second that tax increases were in any way beneficial to arrest climate change ,i would not be driving a six litre V8 car .Nature will decide on climate , everything else done is taxation to raise money for our wasteful government who care not for the intersests of the population .
ian earley, somerton

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 14:02
I wonder if Gordon Brown would be so keen to raise the road tax if he had to pay for his own? You dont see him being driven around in small fuel efficient cars! This is nothing but another way to rip off the motorist.
Richard, Bridgend

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 13:31
All this is doing now is encouraging people who are less well off to buy vehicles registered before March 2001 to avoid paying the rip-off new taxation system.

How is that going to improve the environment / atmosphere etc??

Its going to make newer higher emission cars worthless and older worse emision cars more attractive to avoid the car tax hike!

And anyone who believes the actual C02 figures given by manufacturers is living in a dream world. Most figures are rarely achieved on road!!
Mark Dorsett (CAE Eng Tech AMIMI), Hayes

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 11:40
Vehicle emmissions, CO2 levels, particulates etc have all been big news since 2001 and well known to any car purchaser doing even a modicum of research, but did any of it affect our car buying decisions. No, not for most of us, because we all think the environment is everyone else's problem and bought what we wanted anyway. Now people are being forced to pay according to their car's pollution and the whinging has started. Deal with it.. you've got away with paying less than you should for 7 yrs!
K Walker, Edinburgh

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 10:43
The government are obviously trying to get most cars off the road and force people on to the inadequate bus services. How can a pensioner such as myself afford all these increases? It beggars belief where they think we are getting the money from, everything is going up out of all proportion to the pension increases. They make sure their nest is well feathered, there won't be many MPs going on the bus! The sooner Gordon Brown and his cronies get voted off the better!
Sheila Stevens, Colchester

Have Your Say!
Added: 11 July 2008 00:50
The British public are being completely ripped off by Gordon Brown, retrospective TAX hikes on existing cars is WRONG. On new stuff its fine, consumers can make an informed choice and manufacturers are urged to produce more environmentally friendly cars. They have the power to control it and not the consumer. Given the reasons are based on a pure environmental basis; why are really old polluting are Tax exempt, i.e. the pre 1973 bracket?
Jack Harris, Newcastle

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 22:51
WE traded a Fiat Panda and bought a 1.4 Scenic in Feb 2002 to accomodate 2nd child and all that entails ( with a large dog as well the panda was simply too small ) Car 2nd hand, registered 25/03/01, so why do we have to pay £30 extra tax a year ? What extra pollution are we going to cause ? How could we have possibly known and made an informed choice in Feb 2002 ?? The amount of money is small but the principle of retrospective application is simply beyond comprehension.
tony, southampton

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 22:37
looks like end of labour ?
what will new gov do go to war with fuel rich nations under the pretext of eradicating terrorist breeding grounds?

when really they just want to slap a huge liberation invoice on the country concerned. so they can milk the fuel out for life....

time to leave the country immigrate to Europe..
zak, birmingham

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 22:36
I drive a Seat Alhambra 1.8 20v Turbo this is a mpv for my family of 4 kids me and the wife I will now have to pay the same road tax as a sports car this is not fair my car is a family car why am i being targeted
sajeed, london

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 22:34
One big green con, greed tax
David, nottingham

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 18:04
This is not a Green tax it is a GREED tax. Nail in the coffin for Brown and Darling.
Greg, Cambridge

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 17:57
4 years ago my monthly pertol to and from work 24 mile round trip would cost me £65.00 a month. Now it costs £130.00 per month. I can no longer afford to have family days out because of the rise in petrol. And when the car tax goes up AGAIN i won't be able to afford a car full stop. Public transport is cheaper, though very inconvienient. And with the rising costs of living full stop and wages not rising very much it is becoming increasingy more difficult to actually do anything at all
Stephanie, staffordshire

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 16:31
labour THE GOVERNMENT OF TAX would be great if they were accountable for the tax they take and the general public had a say in how and where it was spent the high fuel tax which then has vat on top and the road fund increases maybe it helps to pay for mps second homes be nice if they actually put it back into making roads safer its seems to me there squeezing everypenny out of the motorist to subsidise themselves sooner we have a change of power the better off we will all be regards paul
paul lawrence, gillingham

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 15:43
Good on you Gordon Brown, why don't you just tell us, you don't give a sh*t about the working class, your final claim to fame before your booted out. Anything would be better than New Labour
Michael Duff, Belfast

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 13:28
The Co2 graded road tax system claims to encourage people to buy new cars with lower emissions. But by applying the tax changes in retrospect, their existing cars value plummets, thus making a trade-in more difficult. Some budget strapped motorists may even opt for an old pre 2001 car (I would), just the opposite of the goverments intent.

Also, what is the definition of a "gas guzzler"? Can a Mondeo 1.8 or 1.4 Polo automatic really be classed as such? These are both fairly cheap cars on fuel!
Rob Gee, Preston

Have Your Say!
Added: 10 July 2008 13:18
Top Gear was spot on about the environmental impact that making a Prius causes. Perhaps Al Gore is also falsifying the truth? Seeing that he actively promotes environmentally friendly products why would he also severely critise the manufacturing methods for such a car? And 104mph in a Prius...dream on. No one gets the claimed 65mpg anyway, real world its 43mpg and top speed is about 90.
Sir Rantalot, Old Londinium