Peugeot Partner Combi 2001

Want to know everything there is to know about this car?

  • Economy

    Value

    5 out of 5 5.0

    Good value for the money as it fulfils its role as a family car/ leisure vehicle, very well.

    Costs

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Costs are reasonable.

  • On the road

    Driving

    4 out of 5 4.0

    It does the job it's supposed to do and the driving position is quite good, but seats could be a bit more comfortable.

    Performance

    3 out of 5 3.0

    Performance suits, as I dont want a rocket and to be fair I think its performance is ok.

  • Living with it

    Reliability

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Silly problems with engine managment control system sows seeds of doubt as to reliability, also I had silly faults with indicators and electric windows.

    Image

    3 out of 5 3.0

    Do not buy this car if you are looking for image. This car is a good family/ outdoor type car with loads of space for children and loads of storage space for tents / canoes, and still is fairly nimble.

    Comfort

    3 out of 5 3.0

    Comfort is ok on journeys up tp 3 hours. After that it gets a bit tiring, but has plenty of leg room in rear seats.

  • Security and Service

    Security

    3 out of 5 3.0

    It does not come with an alarm and for the money paid for it, it should.

    Service

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Service is what lets this car down, as it was off the road on a number of occasions due to the indicators working when they liked and not when you wanted them to. We found we had to do a bit of desk pounding to get even reasonable results.

  • Problems and Ownership

    Problems

    Engine

    Engine management system dropping out, resulting in clouds of black smoke and loss of power.

    Other

    Electrical faults, indicators 3 times, driver's electric windows twice, driver's and front passenger seats unravelling.

    Ownership

    Did you buy the car new?

    New

    Would you buy the same model again?

    Yes

    Did you buy from the same manufacturer again?

    No