Lada 1992 Samara Hatchback
  • Economy

    Value

    3 out of 5 3.0

    You get what you pay for, what more can you say?

    Costs

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Most parts are cheap (though the odd part costs a fortune); running costs very cheap.

  • On the road

    Driving

    1 out of 5 1.0

    Poor - very very poor. Sloppy steering, dreadful brakes, difficult to start in the morning, but does 90mph though! No, HONESTLY!

    Performance

    1 out of 5 1.0

    Acceleration and hills are not good, but once it's up to speed it trundles along happily. Something other motorists seem blind to. 80 mph is still 80 mph even in a Lada, you don"t have to overtake!!!

  • Living with it

    Reliability

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Better than the perception. Only two minor issues in 5 years, but it feels flimsy which doesn't instill confidence.

    Image

    1 out of 5 1.0

    What image? That said, I have grown quite fond of the old bugger... God knows why!

    Comfort

    2 out of 5 2.0

    What shape are Russians? You need very long legs, stumpy arms and enjoy lumbar puncture to feel comfy driving this car.

  • Security and Service

    Security

    1 out of 5 1.0

    Has none - doesn't need it. Only a drunk, blind, certifiably insane masochist would steal it!

    Service

    1 out of 5 1.0

    Nil - they left the country four years ago. I e-mailed the Managing Director in Russia once - apparently all the complaints I listed were my own fault because the car is officially excellent…

  • Problems and Ownership

    Problems

    Engine

    Got to be fair here - no bother, it's a reliable old workhorse but a bit noisy (sspect tappets).

    Other

    Difficult starting in the morning; amplifier and distributor replaced. Clutch went at 26k miles!

    Ownership

    Did you buy the car new?

    Used

    Would you buy the same model again?

    No

    Did you buy from the same manufacturer again?

    No