Kia Ceed GT verdict
2013 - 2018
(change model)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
The Parkers Verdict
This Ceed GT looks good. It’s edgy and aggressive and will look the part alongside more esteemed rivals.
Beyond its looks though, there is not a huge amount going for it. Its acceleration off the line is ok, and it’s not disastrous round corners, but Kia’s ‘performance’ Ceed does little to excite.
Luckily there is quality to be found inside and actually, the interior is one of the best in the price range, but beyond that there is nothing to warrant the expenditure.
Read on for the full Kia Ceed GT review
Top rivals
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
.jpg?mode=max&quality=90&scale=down)
Review contents
1
Overview
2
Practicality & safety
3
Interior, tech & comfort
4
Engines & handling
5
Ownership cost
6