Rover 200 Hatchback 1989-
  • Economy

    Value

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Money well spent.

    Costs

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Rover parts can be pricey, but plenty of spares about.

  • On the road

    Driving

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Can be tricky at times, torque steer is intermittent.

    Performance

    5 out of 5 5.0

    Can't fault it. Grin factor lives on.

  • Living with it

    Reliability

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Faultless for the first year, not bad for 10 year old. Only problem was a misfire on boost (rotor arm), and the usual ABS sensor.

    Image

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Still looks good after 10 years, but can appear dated next to most things now!

    Comfort

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Seats are sporty Recaro derivatives, look good, but can give a few aches on long drives. Steering could do to adjust for reach, but most cars that age didn't.

  • Security and Service

    Security

    3 out of 5 3.0

    Standard is ok, but nothing compared to today's offerings.

    Service

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Parts depts usually try and tell you your car doesn't exist, and that the Coupe was the only model to carry the T16 Turbo. Once you can get them to talk about parts they're usually on the ball.

  • Problems and Ownership

    Problems

    Engine

    None.

    Other

    ABS sensor, misfire on boost (rotor arm).

    Ownership

    Did you buy the car new?

    Used

    Would you buy the same model again?

    Yes

    Did you buy from the same manufacturer again?

    Yes